Please update your Flash Player to view content.
   These are the stories we are working on for this week's newspaper:
  • Deputy shooting fallout: The children of a Portola man who was shot and killed at Eastern Plumas Health Care last year are seeking millions of dollars in damages.
  • The trout must go: The state is planning to pull all of the brook trout out of a Plumas County lake in order to protect the yellow-legged frog.
  • Inspections delayed: Cal Fire was scheduled to begin property inspections this week, but decided to wait until the public could better understand what the inspectors are doing.

Other side weighs in on OHV plan

Joshua Sebold
Staff Writer

Predictably, people on both sides of the debate regarding the use of off-highway vehicles (OHV) on the Plumas National Forest (PNF) have appealed the Forest Service’s proposed Travel Management Plan.

The complaints of various counties and OHV user groups have been aired in this paper as the public process has progressed in Plumas County Board of Supervisors meetings and at public workshops held by the PNF.

Larger national and statewide groups have also entered the fray. Our recent story on the Sierra Access Coalition’s appeal indicated that document was coauthored and supported by a larger OHV user group, the California Off-Road Vehicle Association.

The Wilderness Society and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility are challenging the PNF’s decision from the opposite side in another joint appeal.

The Wilderness Society, founded in 1935, describes itself as “the leading American conservation organization working to protect our nation’s public lands.”

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) was founded in 1992 and characterizes itself as “a national alliance of local, state, and federal resource professionals.”

PEER argues it provides “an important counter-force to those who demand weakening governmental protection of America’s land, air, and water quality.”

The joint appeal argues the PNF’s proposed plan will “fail to halt resource damage, fail to reduce conflicts with other recreational users, fail to ensure that water quality goals are met, and fail to meet other important resource objectives.”

Like the other groups that submitted appeals, this document contended the Forest Service inadequately addressed useful comments made by the public.

The appeal also argued the plan failed to “provide for diverse recreational opportunities, minimize environmental impacts, and markedly reduce recreational conflicts.”

The environmental groups also told the Forest Service they didn’t believe the PNF followed its own rules in coming to its decision.

The document requested the decision be withdrawn and replaced with one “that is in compliance with the law.”

The appeal asked that the final use map only include “those motorized routes which can be justified through appropriate documentation showing that they were designed to be used by the public for long-term motorized recreation.”


Sports Headlines

Top Headline

As weather warms up, golf courses open for season

James Wilson Sports Editor 4/11/2014
  Fore! That word is once again heard in the distance in Plumas County. As springtime springs into action, golf courses across...


California Outdoors for the week of 4/11/2014

Carrie Wilson California Department of Fish and Wildlife   Fish and wildlife regulations don’t always keep up with latest technology Hunting with pellet rifles Question:...


Trojans baseball blows out Portola

Trojans baseball blows out Portola

Quincy’s Jake Wallace is cocked and ready to fire off a fastball. Wallace pitched the second game for Quincy at the Biggs tournament last weekend. File photo...

Contact Us



Facebook Image
Local Events
Yellow Page Directory
Yellow Pages
Visitors Guide

National Headlines

"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}