A jury ruled Wednesday that two California Highway Patrol officers had legitimate reasons for pulling over Ruth Jackson and arresting her on suspicion of driving under the influence nearly three years ago.
Judge Thomas E. Warriner read the verdict at 3:30 p.m. in Plumas County Superior Court in Quincy. The jurors deliberated most of the day before reaching a verdict.
The Jackson family appeared stunned as 11 of the 12 jurors said they voted in favor of the CHP.
As the jurors filed out of the room, the two CHP officers who were on trial and their attorney quietly gestured their appreciation to the nine-woman, three-man panel. But the officers weren’t celebrating.
“We are gratified,” said attorney Stephen Pass, who represented the CHP officers.
Pass said he had the option of moving the trial out of Plumas County. “But we didn’t,” he said. “I felt we could get a fair trial here.
“I think it says a lot about the people of this county, that despite certain feelings, they were able to set those feelings aside and be impartial,” Pass said.
Jackson said she couldn’t understand the jury’s decision.
“After all the trouble the people here have had with the highway patrol, I just can’t believe that a majority of the jury would come to this conclusion,” Jackson said. “I’m stunned.”
CHP officers Jim Wheaton and Lacey Heitman, though appearing visibly relieved and thankful, didn’t want to comment on the record until they had approval from their office.
Quincy Area CHP Commander Bruce Carpenter said his department was advised not to comment.
“It’s still considered active litigation,” Carpenter said. “There is always the possibility of an appeal.”
Carpenter said the CHP was preparing a statement and that the officers would be available for comment “at the appropriate time.”
Jackson’s civil lawsuit stemmed from her Sept. 12, 2009, arrest and jailing on charges of driving under the influence after she left an Oktoberfest event at the Blairsden Barn, where she was working as a volunteer.
Her civil complaint said that she had a blood alcohol level of 0.00 and had no drugs in her system at the time of her arrest.
However, the jury sided with the CHP’s claim that Jackson appeared to be impaired after failing field sobriety tests.
For a more detailed report, see the June 27 issue of Feather Publishing’s Plumas County newspapers.
- Assemblyman to speak at Memorial Day ceremony
- Pacific Crest Trail Association: the brains and brawn behind the PCT
- Water to become a standing agenda item
- Neighbors want private property cleaned up
- Two former Lassen County residents murdered in Fernley
- Obituaries for the week of 5/16/2013
- Greenville loses to American Christian
- Business Scene for the week of 5/16/2013
- Fishing Report for the week of 5/16/2013
- Greenville logger transforms biomass into bundles of firewood
Add comment
Comments are limited to 300 characters. If you would like to post a longer message, please submit a letter to the editor. Submit a letter to the editor. Letters to the editor are limited to a maximum of 300 words. Deadline for submittal is noon on Thursdays.
Sports Headlines
Greenville loses to American Christian
Greenville’s James Martinez rounds third and gives his coach Mike Chelotti a high five after hitting a homer during the Indians’ game against American Christian...
Read More...175 mile Sierra Nevada Relay to run through Plumas County
This gorgeous view of mountains towering over a valley is one of many that runners in the upcoming Sierra Nevada Relay will encounter. The relay starts at Donner...
Read More...Fishing Report for the week of 5/16/2013
Unsettled weather has ended; time to hit the water Ben Williams, a Lake Almanor Fly Fishing Company Guide landed this monster rainbow from Goodrich Creek near...
Read More...












Comments
an old lady unimpaired went to jail because the CHP were over zealous FACT... foot surgeries: the only reason she could not walk the straight line..this story would have never been told had it been someone with no legal power..
This is a system that is broken!
This result came because of the question defined by the Judge. "Believe" is a CHP opinion, not a fact of blood alcohol.
I do neither pop pills or do I drink a lot, I still dont trust most of the cops around here!!!
Great! When you're being attacked call a criminal, you can trust them! You must be guilty of something to have such issues.I know several local officers and they are very honorable people
If you are too uncoordinated to walk or stand, I don't want you driving a car
I'm sure the CHP has heard every excuse in the book for failing a field test. They did what they are required by law to do in that situation
Done.
RSS feed for comments to this post