Settlement to include cash and transfer of timberlands
According to a memo from SPI owners Red, George and Mark Emmerson to SPI employees Monday, July 9, the settlement will include cash and a transfer of some timberlands.
In their memo, the Emmersons reassured their employees that the settlement would not affect their jobs or the overall viability of SPI.
The Emmersons said they still believe neither SPI nor its contractors started the fire, but because they could still be found responsible, they decided to settle.
The federal government has settled its suit against Sierra Pacific Industries over who started the 2007 Moonlight Fire, sources reported Thursday, July 5.
The terms of the agreement have not been made public. All parties are expected to sign the agreement by Wednesday, July 11, at which time the terms will be disclosed.
The government sought $700 million in alleged damage to the Plumas and Lassen national forests. Besides suppression, investigation, collection and administration costs, the feds also seek payment for loss of timber, habitat and environmental value as well as costs for rehabilitation and restoration.
The settlement will likely be the largest ever in a case about the origin of a wildfire. Previously, the Storrie Fire settlement, at $102 million, was the richest. Union Pacific settled that case in 2008. The Storrie Fire burned 52,000 acres in the Plumas and Lassen national forests in 2000.
The Moonlight agreement came as the suit was scheduled to go to trial. Instead, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows called for negotiations.
Unspecified logging operations were the cause of the fire, according to a brief report given to the media more than a month after the fire by Forest Service officials.
It took almost two years before the investigative report would be released to the public.
The official cause identified in the report was a rock strike from the front blade of a bulldozer driven by a Howell’s Forest Harvesting employee.
The fire originated in the Cooks Creek Timber Sale.
The property manager named in the suit was W.M. Beaty and Associates of Redding, which was responsible for submitting the timber harvest plan and was the timber seller.
The purchaser named in the suit was Sierra Pacific Industries of Anderson.
The timber operator listed was Eunice Howell, owner of Howell’s Forest Harvesting of Shasta County.
The federal suit is just one of several in the legal finger-pointing over who was responsible for starting the fire. CalFire has its own suit in Plumas Superior Court seeking $8.4 million in fire suppression, investigation, administration and accounting costs.
- Assemblyman to speak at Memorial Day ceremony
- Pacific Crest Trail Association: the brains and brawn behind the PCT
- Water to become a standing agenda item
- Neighbors want private property cleaned up
- Two former Lassen County residents murdered in Fernley
- Obituaries for the week of 5/16/2013
- Greenville loses to American Christian
- Business Scene for the week of 5/16/2013
- Fishing Report for the week of 5/16/2013
- Greenville logger transforms biomass into bundles of firewood
Add comment
Comments are limited to 300 characters. If you would like to post a longer message, please submit a letter to the editor. Submit a letter to the editor. Letters to the editor are limited to a maximum of 300 words. Deadline for submittal is noon on Thursdays.
Sports Headlines
Greenville loses to American Christian
Greenville’s James Martinez rounds third and gives his coach Mike Chelotti a high five after hitting a homer during the Indians’ game against American Christian...
Read More...175 mile Sierra Nevada Relay to run through Plumas County
This gorgeous view of mountains towering over a valley is one of many that runners in the upcoming Sierra Nevada Relay will encounter. The relay starts at Donner...
Read More...Fishing Report for the week of 5/16/2013
Unsettled weather has ended; time to hit the water Ben Williams, a Lake Almanor Fly Fishing Company Guide landed this monster rainbow from Goodrich Creek near...
Read More...












Comments
You are completely right about that. Trust me the now 90+ year decision by the FS to not allow sufficient logging and or natural burns to occur have created a tinderbox. However in this specific case a "delayed" response by the FS did not change what would happen either way.
RSS feed for comments to this post