TEXT_SIZE
Please update your Flash Player to view content.

Supervisors spar over committee appointment

Dan McDonald
Staff Writer
5/16/2012

 

Supervisor Terry Swofford told Supervisor Lori Simpson he was “pissed off” at her for questioning his integrity.

Swofford’s anger grew when Simpson laughed at him and said, “I’m sorry, but I’ve seen you in action. I don’t think you would represent us and be fair.”

That exchange highlighted a 30-minute verbal wrestling match between the supervisors as they fought to see which one would be appointed to the Coordinated Resource Management (CRM) executive committee.

The supervisors’ entertaining brawl caught the other supervisors and the audience at the meeting Tuesday, May 8, by surprise.

The surprise was mainly because the CRM executive committee, formed in 1989, has never been called on to render a decision. In fact, it has never met.

The supervisors ultimately settled the matter with a coin flip, won by Simpson. But not before a sometimes comic debate that prompted laughter and occasional one-liners from people who couldn’t believe what they were seeing.

But while the audience was entertained, Simpson and Swofford said they were dead serious about wanting to be on the committee.

“When we are on that committee, we are involving the whole county,” Swofford said. “And the issues are big enough that we may end up in a lawsuit because we are involved in this.”

The issues Swofford cited concerned the controversial watershed restoration technique known as “pond and plug.”

The program, originally designed to bring restoration grant money into the county to offset the loss of natural resource jobs, has become a polarizing issue.

Downstream water users want the water to continue flowing their direction as it always has.

Ranchers and users living in the watershed want to see the upstream meadows restored so they have better water storage in the summer.

Many of the ranchers live in Swofford’s eastern-county district. And Swofford said “pond and plug” was the issue that most concerned him.

Simpson argued she should be on the executive committee because she would be more objective than Swofford.

“You’re too influenced,” Simpson told Swofford. “And I’m more objective, because it’s not in my area. It’s in your area. You are going to take a certain position, where I’m going to take a neutral position.”

“I disagree with that,” Swofford said.

“And I’m closer to the meetings,” Simpson said.

“I ain’t buying that either, Lori,” Swofford said.

In between Simpson and Swofford’s jousting, Plumas Corporation Executive Director Greg O’Sullivan tried to emphasize that whomever the supervisors appointed to the committee needed to have an open mind.

“It’s very important that whatever the appointment is today, it’s balanced — that this board doesn’t become a veto board for projects moving forward,” O’Sullivan said, adding that the four-member executive committee’s decisions had to be unanimous.

O’Sullivan said “pond and plug” is just one of the issues the committee would face. He said a lot of the projects “are not controversial and need to move forward. They have grant funding and timelines to them.”

O’Sullivan said the Feather River CRM group, which is under the direction of Plumas Corporation, can’t afford to be bogged down by politics.

John Kolb, who is on the CRM steering committee, wondered aloud whether politics had anything to do with the Simpson-Swofford battle.

“I know both (Swofford and Simpson) are in an election battle themselves right now,” Kolb said. “I don’t know what bearing that is going to end up having on this. But we need to have some stability at the top. And we need some direction that is not politically motivated, but motivated by science and results. This is an issue that is going to continue on past elections.”

Supervisor Sherrie Thrall, who was sick, didn’t attend the meeting. Supervisors Robert Meacher and Jon Kennedy said they couldn’t decide whom to pick for the committee. They said they felt Simpson or Swofford would do a good job.

O’Sullivan objected to Meacher’s idea of naming both supervisors to the committee. So Meacher and Kennedy looked at each other and tried to come up with a solution.

“This issue to me is just a flip of the coin,” Meacher said.

“I don’t like flipping a coin. I think that’s stupid,” Simpson said.

“They should both (be on the committee),” Meacher said. “And they both care.”

“I would be more objective,” Simpson said again. “I’ve been working on water issues and natural resource issues.”

“Oh, and I haven’t been working on water issues?” Swofford said. “Sherrie (Thrall) ought to weigh in on this. I think she has a …”

“She has your vote?” Simpson said, igniting another round of laughter from the audience.

“So what is wrong with Meacher’s idea? He has an idea for the county and not the Assembly race right now,” Kennedy said, taking a light-hearted jab at the board chairman, who is running for the state Assembly.

Kennedy added it didn’t really matter which supervisor was named to the executive committee because major CRM decisions would probably require approval from the Board of Supervisors.

“That is what I’m saying,” Swofford said.

“So you can’t veto everything if we (supervisors) are going to make the decision,” Simpson told Swofford.

“Lori, you keep saying that,” Swofford said. “It does kind of upset me that you are accusing me of planning to veto stuff that you don’t even know what we are talking about! OK?

“You are questioning my integrity. I’m damn pissed off!”

When Simpson reacted to Swofford’s outburst by laughing, Swofford grew more upset.

“You just keep laughing!” Swofford said.

“I’m sorry. I’m sorry,” Simpson said, trying to compose herself. “But I saw you in action (during a public meeting addressing watershed issues the previous week). And I thought you had an agenda there. And I don’t think you would represent us and be fair.”

“That’s your opinion,” Swofford replied.

“Was it regarding ‘pond and plug’?” Kennedy asked Simpson about her opinion of Swofford.

“Yes.” Simpson said.

After a few more minutes of debate, Meacher decided a coin flip was the best way to solve the problem. He said the loser of the flip would become an alternate on the committee.

“This ain’t gonna look good in the paper that you flipped a coin to decide this,” Swofford said.

“It’s been in the paper before. We’ve done it before. He’s done it,” Kennedy said, pointing at Meacher.

After Kennedy and Meacher reached in their pockets and failed to come up with a coin, O’Sullivan held up one of his.

“Looking for a coin?” O’Sullivan said. “Having budget problems?”

O’Sullivan’s remark sparked another round of belly laughs in the supervisors’ chambers.

After the laughter subsided, Meacher tried to explain that he wasn’t trying to make a joke of the decision by flipping a coin.

“The legislative intent of flipping the coin is because both the individuals are equally qualified,” Meacher said. “And it’s not to make light of it.”

“Shall we let the lady call?” Kennedy said. “I’m going to make a motion based on the result of this coin toss.”

“OK …” Simpson said, “heads.”

Meacher flipped the coin and covered it on the back of his hand as he turned toward County Counsel Craig Settlemire.

“Counsel?” Meacher said, uncovering the coin.

“It’s heads,” Settlemire said, trying to fight back his smile.

“OK, I move that Lori Simpson be appointed to this,” Kennedy said, “and Terry Swofford as alternate.”

“So ordered,” Meacher said.

“Can I have my quarter back?” O’Sullivan said.

“That was very interesting,” Meacher said after he dug O’Sullivan’s 25 cents out of his pocket.

“I hate to see what they are going to say in the paper, though,” Swofford said.

Comments  

 
+11#1RE: Supervisors spar over committee appointmentNo wonder2012-05-16 06:06
Important political decisions come down to the flip of the coin in Plumas County. This is how two adults settle differences and make decisions. Outlook for improvement in the county is 50/50.
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+9#2ResidentFrank Story2012-05-16 09:52
Ok And You wonder why politics leave a bad taste in every one mouth. Flip a coin ? In other words don't ask Me to make a tough decision just because that what I was elected to do.
No Surprise
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+8#3hummmmmMe2012-05-16 10:05
I have known Mr. Swofford for many many years and have no reason to doubt his integrity!! Simpson just lost my vote!
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-12#4Coin TossJon Kennedy2012-05-16 17:40
It wasn't that tough of a decision...some things are just left to be decided by dead Presidents...On a serious note, both Supervisors would have done a fine job representing the citizens on this committee. BTW, the tough decisions are carefully contemplated, not typically by a coin flip. :-)
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+13#5RE: Supervisors spar over committee appointmentAnna2012-05-16 17:49
The board should be embarrassed for making such a mockery of the system. No wonder Plumas County is losing revenue. Poor leadership. The only Supervisor who deserves respect wasn't there. Shame this mattered couldn't have Bern carried over and held in a civil manner.
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+11#6CharadesGW2012-05-17 06:46
This is typical of a government body who is clueless. The CRM has been around since 1989 and has never even met or rendered a decision. I wonder if Ms. Simpson was on laughing gas. Poor Mr. Swofford is really that fragile? Mr. Meacher as usual is so disengaged, he had to flip a coin. CHARADES !!!
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+11#7CharadesGW2012-05-17 06:56
Mr. Meacher, if elected to CA State Assembly thinks fipping a coin is how he would break the gridlock of Sacramento. He probably wouldn't even have the time to get a coin out of his pocket, it would interfere with his tweeting and texting. The vote will have taken place, and he was only PRESENT.
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+11#8Who Cares About the Coin?Amber McMichael2012-05-17 08:13
Honestly, deciding a committee appointment by coin toss isn't that big of a deal. The dismissive and condescending tone used by Simpson is, though. You don't have to agree with your fellow supervisors, but that attitude she displayed revealed a lot about her character.
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+6#9RE: Supervisors spar over committee appointmentC. Eclair2012-05-17 09:05
Why waste the time to fight over a position on the CRM group when in fact it was reported that it has never met or rendered an opinion or decision. Kind of a moot point and alot of foolishness and BTW: good riddance Meacher.
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-4#10Coin tossMicke2012-05-18 09:57
Lighten up, people! According to the article, both supervisors who wanted the appointment are qualified. One won, and the other is alternate. It doesn't seem fair to criticize if we weren't there to hear the whole thing. Is this the only business that was done at the meeting?
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+4#11flippantsome things are just left to b2012-05-19 18:30
Its really not that funny Jon.

Why is it you cant be In-Front of some these recent issues ?

Where is YOUR lEADERSHIP?
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-3#12No 70Ton Garbage TrucksThank Goodness2012-05-19 18:59
Thankfully Lori cant run on Her Legacy of having having Forced 70Ton Garbage Trucks ruining our streets :lol:
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+9#13A matter of decision makingConcerned Voter2012-05-21 07:46
I've known Terry Swofford, and in my opinion, integrity is NOT something he lacks. What concerns me is these county "officials, people entrusted with the well-being of the people in the area making decisions with a coin. THIS is one reason why the county is weak, it lacks competent leadership!
Quote| Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Feather Publishing encourages civil discussion on news stories that are important to our community. We do ask that commenters follow certain rules of conduct. Keep your comments on the topic at hand. Threats, insults, lies, and inappropriate language are prohibited. Just as with our letters to the editor we want you to be accountable for your comments so we ask that you use your full real name. We reserve the right to delete any comments that do not comply with these rules of conduct. Commenters who repeatedly do not comply will be prohibited from posting further comments.
Comments are limited to 300 characters. If you would like to post a longer message, please submit a letter to the editor. Submit a letter to the editor. Letters to the editor are limited to a maximum of 300 words. Deadline for submittal is noon on Thursdays.


Move
-

Sports Headlines

Top Headline

Little League nears regional tourneys

Little League nears regional tourneys

Greenville’s catcher, Brent Washoe, is a second too late as Chester’s Jason Schlueter slides into home plate for a run during a Chester home game in late May. ...

Read More...

Fishing Report for the week of 6/13/2013

Fishing Report for the week of 6/13/2013

Hunter Hedman displays a beautiful brown trout he caught at Bucks Lake. It took him only five minutes of fishing to hook the biggest fish of his life, he said....

Read More...

A delicate delicacy Morel hunting in Plumas County

A delicate delicacy  Morel hunting in Plumas County

Morel mushrooms are scattered across the foreground of an area burned by the Chips Fire out near Caribou. During the month of May and early June, mushroom hunters...

Read More...
Facebook Image
Local Events

EasternPlumas

Contact Us

up_contact

Visitors Guide
Yellow Page Directory
Yellow Pages

National Headlines

Dining Guide
DGCover
 
Plumas County
Moving and Storage
Forest Stweardship
 
ForestStwd.gif
Help Wanted
Help Wanted

Help WantedClick to see current job opportunities

Restaurant

 

Advertise with us

LassenNews.com
"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}