TEXT_SIZE

ColdwellBnr

What do we want? CHP officers who act or react?

Where I Stand
Keri Cameron, retired California Highway Patrol officer
9/7/2011

Maybe it will come as no surprise to some of you that I would write in support of the California Highway Patrol. I am not ignorant of “bad cops,” as I have worked with more than one. I do not believe that we have any “bad cops” working for the CHP in Plumas County.

There are officers who were sent here, through little choice of their own, who may not have the finesse in talking to people that they will one day develop. Some officers may be over-zealous or see the law as more black and white than others.

Officers have every right to learn the job so that if they were ever to transfer to a larger area, they would be safe. And to learn the job, shouldn’t they be able to enforce any laws that our legislators have enacted? Why, because they came to a small town, are they expected to be limited in whom they stop or why they stop them?

Should the California Vehicle Code be highlighted with the laws that can “actually” be enforced in Plumas County? And why would that be? What makes the people here above the law?

To those who don’t know, I recently retired from the CHP after 25 years of service. More than half of that time was spent in busy metropolitan areas. I came here because of my father’s illness.

I had never intended that any of my career would be spent in the small town where I grew up. Once I came home though, there was something rewarding about working in a town where maybe we actually made a difference, where the laws we enforced, though not always popular, benefited people that we cared about.

When I was in the Bay Area, death and injury of officers was not uncommon. One incident, in particular, touched me more deeply than any other. An officer I worked with made a routine stop and was subsequently shot in the head. He would have been shot more than once but the violator’s gun jammed. The man tried to get the officer’s gun away from him but even though he had suffered a near-fatal injury he had the wherewithal to hang onto his gun, saving his life.

This was a very difficult time in our office and made many officers question if they had chosen the right career, whether the good we tried to do on a daily basis was worth it.

I can only tell you how it hit me personally. It occurred to me that the man shot the tan uniform and what that uniform represented. Not the officer himself, because he didn’t know this officer or the man he was or the good he did. He shot any officer who happened to pull him over wearing that uniform. He had a deeply engrained hate for law enforcement.

I called a friend here and I tried to convey that she, too, should be upset, not because a man she had never known had been shot, but that a man she had never known had been shot just doing his job — his job protecting her and untold numbers of people who would also never know him or the important work he was doing for them.

He didn’t do the job because he would get more money if he wrote more tickets, arrested more drunken drivers, handled more accidents, but because he had taken a job to serve — not to always be liked or respected, but to serve. He was shot because he chose to serve.

I speak of that story from my past because something happened Aug. 25 that brought up similar feelings for me. Officer Hymas was on patrol on Highway 70 doing a job that has become a very unpopular job in Plumas County. He was nearly hit head-on by an extremely intoxicated driver.

Thank God he was not looking at his radio, watching for deer or any of the many things that will divert a driver’s attention. The oncoming vehicle suddenly drove into his path and was coming right at him.

Hymas had the time to swerve to the right. The intoxicated driver’s vehicle hit the patrol car on the driver’s side, lessening the impact, but caused the patrol car to spin out of control and collide with a streetlight.

But here is what strikes me: Suppose the intoxicated driver had just driven through Portola and he passed a CHP officer, and in the moment the officer encountered the car it had a taillight or a license plate light that was not working, but that officer opted not to make a traffic stop because vocal people in the community think that the CHP should not be focusing on things so petty.

And now suppose that it was your son or daughter, wife or husband who was hit a short time later, who was maybe not looking ahead at that moment and was hit head-on. Many times you don’t have the opportunity to view a person’s driving for long periods of time; there is only that moment in time to make a judgment call that may save someone’s life.

Shouldn’t the CHP be able to use any lawful means to check the status of any driver if the sole purpose is to keep you and yours safe? Again, this is not for increased pay, more days off, popularity, but simply for the safety of the people in the community.

I think many of you owe a debt of gratitude to Hymas and the other officers who put their lives on the line for you every day. Law enforcement is a tough job when everything is going right, but imagine how much more difficult it becomes in an environment where people are criticizing you and your character. And imagine one more thing: How would you feel if Hymas had been killed, his wife widowed and his four small children left without their dad, who is their hero? Maybe he should be yours!

Years ago I worked with an officer who made it her policy to never stop mechanical violations after dark. Her reasoning was that she was not going to risk her life for a minor violation. Consequently, she was not taking the number of intoxicated drivers off the road that the rest of the officers were.

Her role, as she saw it, was reactive: If the call came in, she would respond to it. She arrested intoxicated drivers — but it was after they’d crashed. Is that what the people here want? Officers who languish waiting for the next call, instead of officers who are proactive, who will look for the intoxicated or otherwise unsafe drivers before they hurt themselves or someone else?

If that is the result of this situation it will be the citizens of this county, and those who travel through it, who will lose in the end.

 

Comments  

 
0#1RE: What do we want? CHP officers who act or react?Heather Powell2011-09-07 08:25
I can't help but wonder how many people are reading these articles lately that would like to comment, but won't do it due to the fact that posting their name is required. I wouldnt be surprised if the number is quite high. People already feel they are being scrutinized unfairly over this issue.
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-2#2RE: What do we want? CHP officers who act or react?Bandito2011-09-07 08:36
You cannot cite a person for one licencse plate light out.There is still one there lighting up the plate and it is not a viotation. Are you harrassing folks for pulling them over to tell them the light is out.No. But if you accuse and menace the person because of light.. YES! that is harrassment!
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-4#3RE: What do we want? CHP officers who act or react?Joe Smith2011-09-07 15:31
The people that are being harrassed are not dui, they are however being treated that way because they have a light out. It is not an officer informing them that they have a light out and need to get it repaired, it is an officer treating them as guilty and intimidating them.
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+2#4About timeFedUp2011-09-08 00:25
Right on Keri, Im glad someone finally said it. This situation is detering officers from doing their job and will end up hurting and killing more people, whether they see it coming or not. The whining has to stop. This "harrasment" that people claim is not real. It's just polital antics at its worst
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+5#5Joe SmithJoe2011-09-08 09:06
Exactly how do they know if someone is drunk until they stop them? I have an idea! I'm going to put a big sign in my back window that says "I haven't been drinking". That should work, right? Surprise!! people lie to cops. I think they have a duty to ask some simple questions during a stop!
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-7#6RE: What do we want? CHP officers who act or react?Bandito2011-09-08 10:29
Dear Mr. Fedup, your turn will come and when it does please do not complain. Ask Mr. Joe Hagwood what it feels like to be pulled over and accused of being DUI when all you did was pull across the street. You catch more flies with honey than with vinagar.. just sayin'...
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+4#7Thank YouAnne2011-09-09 23:32
Very well written, thank you Keri. This article really puts it into perspective. I am thankful for Officer Hymas, and for all officers who are merely doing their jobs to serve and protect us. Thank goodness he wasn't hurt, and was able to return home safely to his family.
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-7#8Already Convicted?fedup22011-09-11 08:39
If the driver has'n been to court yet & hasent been convicted of DUI in this case..Is it fair a former CHP is "convicting" the driver here?

What happened to innocent untill Proven Guilty?
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-7#9Already Convicted?fedup22011-09-11 08:50
The initial report in the paper stated the officer was en-route to a domestic to backup the S.O. Now its routine-patrol? In looking at the scene & the totalled patrol car, how fast was the officer driving? IMO if he would have been going that fast in a CHP SUV it could have been tragic
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-4#10RE: What do we want? CHP officers who act or react?fedup22011-09-11 09:19
I thank former officer Cameron for their service to our State.However i dont think it does justice to our community when someone who has NOT been adjudicated & is only under suspicion @ this time is IMO "convicted" in an Op-Ed by someone associated with LE
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
+2#11DUIJoe2011-09-11 12:59
"He was nearly hit head-on by an extremely intoxicated driver." She didn't say a D.U.I. driver. If she said D.U.I. one could argue a conclusion has been made to the driver's guilt. Anyone, officer or not, is able to conclude if someone is intoxicated. Fedup2, you jumped the gun on this one!
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-2#12DUIJoe2011-09-11 13:13
Being suspected of DUI is like being suspected of a crime that is caught on tape. Either your over the legal limit and go to jail, or your not, and you don't. The only way to get out of true D.U.I., is some type of legal technicality.
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-6#13RE: What do we want? CHP officers who act or react?fedup22011-09-11 14:05
"Keyword suspect..Was the author of this op-ed at the scene, wintnessed 1st hand the drivers intoxication & or breath-results?..no? Hearsay isnt admissible in court, is it? So why use it here by someone who wasnt at the scene, if the driver has not been convicted yet
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
-2#14chpsmittym2011-09-12 14:09
I have no problem with the CHP doing their job.Thats what their payed for.
My problem is the the ones who ignore the laws that they are suppose to enforce.
For example
speeding accross sierra valley in a patrol car when not responding to a call
Quote| Report to administrator
 
 
0#1532S6 CHP (retired)Kevin Kelly2013-02-17 15:20
Hey Keri:

Great article. I wish I had seen it sooner. Better late than never. Good for you for your 25 years of service. I always thought you were one of the good ones. You always showed up when it hit the fan. Take care.

Kev 6516
Quote| Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Feather Publishing encourages civil discussion on news stories that are important to our community. We do ask that commenters follow certain rules of conduct. Keep your comments on the topic at hand. Threats, insults, lies, and inappropriate language are prohibited. Just as with our letters to the editor we want you to be accountable for your comments so we ask that you use your full real name. We reserve the right to delete any comments that do not comply with these rules of conduct. Commenters who repeatedly do not comply will be prohibited from posting further comments.
Comments are limited to 300 characters. If you would like to post a longer message, please submit a letter to the editor. Submit a letter to the editor. Letters to the editor are limited to a maximum of 300 words. Deadline for submittal is noon on Thursdays.


Facebook Image
Local Events

Contact Us

up_contact

Plumas Flood on DVD

Click to Learn more

Dining Guide
 
Plumas County
"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}